PureWick Female External Catheter

PureWick Female External Catheter
    Becton Dickinson

    Select Option:

    Add to Cart

    PureWick Female External Catheter from HealthyKin.com is a non-invasive wick made of soft, flexible fabric that draws urine away from the body into a collection canister. The wick should be replaced every 8 to 12 hours.

    PureWick Female External Catheter Features:

    • Non-invasive
    • Designed to be used by women exclusively
    • Latex free
    • Accessory kit includes (1) 2000cc collection canister with lid, (1) pump tubing, and (1) collector tubing with elbow connector.

    Part numbers: PWF030K, PWF030K, PWKIT03

    Related Products

      Customer Reviews

      (4.30)
      # of Ratings: 20
      Rate It!
      Click Here to rate this product
      1. on 10/3/2025, said:
      I was in the hospital and I used one and I thought it worked very good
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (1 people found this comment helpful, 0 did not)
      2. on 7/2/2025, said:
      Using this in hospital for my 90yr old mom and its wonderful!But so sad that it's VERY expensive for normal people outside the hospital! Burst my bubble!
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (5 people found this comment helpful, 0 did not)
      3. on 5/30/2025, said:
      Have not used yet
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (0 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
      4. on 5/26/2025, said:
      When I purchased this product for home use 2 years ago, it was even more expensive! It didn't work for me at ALL! I later discovered that the hospital version has suction control and is entirely different than the home version. That was never made clear. The public is not allowed to buy the hospital version. I lost a lot of money because what I purchased could not be returned. Don't get sucked into this.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (16 people found this comment helpful, 0 did not)
      5. on 12/29/2024, said:
      why doesnt insurance cover any of this
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (11 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
      6. on 10/29/2024, said:
      not a help for fixed income people. used in hospttal and was great . wish i could afford it.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (14 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
      7. on 10/23/2024, said:
      Great Product but way too expensive to use at home. Wish they thought more of us customers. No gratitude here. I will look for other options.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (13 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
      8. on 9/11/2024, said:
      i was introduced to this while in yhe hospital planned to purchase system on discharge home, sadlywe are not in position to afford the monthly supplieai have Breen using incontinence product fot the past 6 mos.none keep me ddry. iaman RNwith 50 years of exp
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (11 people found this comment helpful, 0 did not)
      9. on 6/30/2024, said:
      in 2022 these were 100.00 for a case of 30. Thanks for making an otherwise great product unaffordable for those who really need it..... SHAME ON YOU!!! A.C.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (28 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
      10. on 5/6/2024, said:
      I rated it this bc while I was using this for 3 weeks i developed a skin tear on my bottom
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (9 people found this comment helpful, 2 did not)
      11. on 4/14/2024, said:
      There's a reason for just a 3 rating because they have this product in one place and making it hard to afford and want put it in stores so it's available for women's use that's so rude and shameful to treat women with this kind of abuse.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (26 people found this comment helpful, 2 did not)
      12. on 3/24/2024, said:
      Does s s or wc pay for the purewick
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (4 people found this comment helpful, 9 did not)
      13. on 2/4/2024, said:
      Really a.great invention.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (13 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
      14. on 1/11/2024, said:
      Wish it were affordable for home use.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (30 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
      15. on 12/27/2023, said:
      This system has made our lives easier. It is worth the price.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (8 people found this comment helpful, 6 did not)
      16. on 8/21/2023, said:
      Have been using for my 92 yo Mom at home for 18+ months. She's bed-bound and this keeps her dry but if the catheter moves out of place, there will be "leaks" or it can pinch the skin and cause irritation. Must be replaced after 12 hours or there will be a UTI. She sleeps through the night now, it's definitely worth the cost depending upon your situation. Direct purchase from manufacturer is about one-third less expensive but you have to buy at least 30 catheters, not sold individually.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (43 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
      17. on 12/3/2022, said:
      Mother had in hospital. Too expensive to have at home.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (37 people found this comment helpful, 4 did not)
      18. on 5/28/2022, said:
      I used this in the hospital. I loved it! It would be nice to have it at home.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (34 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
      19. on 5/17/2022, said:
      Just used this in hospital yesterday. Fabulous no pain. Wish the unit was less pricey. I would buy for sure. Weak bladder, overactive bladder, prevents accidents.. I love it. Let me know when a person on a fixed income can afford it... ☮🎶🎈
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (53 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
      20. on 5/1/2022, said:
      My mother had this while in the hospital. She loved it. She said feels weird at first but works great.
      Was this comment helpful? yes no
      (31 people found this comment helpful, 3 did not)
      Showing comments 1-20 of 20